
It has fluff and its not a reptile!
(I love it dont worrry, no offence to the artist to this deviation. I just want to show what I mean)
The Journal Portal
Browse Journals |
Polls |
deviantART [dee·vee·un'nt·ART]
Keep in Touch!
|
Deviousness |
Also: piggies are adorable. <33333
I didn't mean to make you make a journal. I assume you spend hours perfecting your drawings, in-fact I know you do, I've seen your live streams. But as the pictures of your gecko, which were not shot in a studio OR professionally edited probably took you five minutes to take, I do think its unfair they got front page.
I wasn't saying photography is awful or whatever it is you're trying to suggest, I was actually trying to be sympathetic, because those photos, out of all your work, were not your finest.
Sorry if I hurt you're feelings, I'll just go back to my corner so you can go tell a five-thousand of you're watchers how you're point and shoot gecko photos are comparable to a professional photographer.
She never once said her photos were as good or better than others, simply that she shouldn't have to deal with people telling her that something out of her control is unfair and she shouldn't be allowed to post such things.
Answer: There is no reason why she shouldn't, because she can if she wants.
Secondly, she never said any names. She doesn't have a choice whether her pictures or anyone else's lands on the front page or not. It's not in her control, as stated by *BeefyStew.
Being sympathetic? Really? She doesn't need sympathy in this. I enjoyed the pictures because the edits were simple and not overly done like some 9-year-old on a photo editing site sticking 'CUUUUTEEE!!!!' stickers on it and changing the colour to where you can't even tell what it was originally.
Lastly, that was just completely uncalled for and rude. She's not boasting about her pet, she's just showing her simplistic pictures with minor edits to us. She doesn't have five-thousand watchers, so in saying that, you're making it seem as if she's a big shot.